Summers v. Mcclanahan Summers v. Mcclanahan

Summers v. Mcclanahan

140 CAL.APP.4TH 403, 44 CAL.RPTR.3D 338, 2006 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 7353, 06 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 5032, 2006.CA.0004851

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Plaintiff, The Ebensteiner Company, Inc., has appealed from the demurrer dismissal of its second amended complaint. The second amended complaint alleged causes of action for constructive fraud, conspiracy to defraud, and fiduciary duty breach against defendant, the Chadmar Group. While the appeal was pending, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. We conclude the settlement agreement, which explicitly requires the present appeal be dismissed, has rendered moot the issue of whether the demurrer dismissal should have been entered. We therefore order dismissal of the present appeal.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
12 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
20
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
75.3
KB

More Books by In the Court of Appeal of the State of California Second Appellate District Division Seven

Holguin v. Flores Holguin v. Flores
2004
People v. Seijas People v. Seijas
2004
People V. Saucedo People V. Saucedo
2004
People V. Garcia People V. Garcia
2004
In re Marriage of David M. In re Marriage of David M.
2006
Wayne v. Staples Wayne v. Staples
2006