12/11/92 Eddie Bowling V. Ansted 12/11/92 Eddie Bowling V. Ansted

12/11/92 Eddie Bowling V. Ansted

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

1. "'Upon a motion to direct a verdict for the defendant, every reasonable and legitimate inference fairly arising from the testimony, when considered in its entirety, must be indulged in favorably to plaintiff; and the court must assume as true those facts which the jury may properly find under the evidence.' Syllabus, Nichols v. Raleigh-Wyoming Coal Co., 112 W.Va. 85, 163 S.E. 767 (1932)." Syllabus Point 1, Elkins Manor Associates v. Eleanor Concrete Works, Inc., 183 W.Va. 501, 396 S.E.2d 463 (1990).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1992
11 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
18
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
65.1
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Franklin Anderson v. State Workers' Franklin Anderson v. State Workers'
1985
State West Virginia v. Michael Dean Easter State West Virginia v. Michael Dean Easter
1983
Tax Assessments Against Pocahontas Land Tax Assessments Against Pocahontas Land
1983
Marlin H. Douglas v. Nancy L. Douglas Marlin H. Douglas v. Nancy L. Douglas
1982
Donald L. Jenkins and Barbara Jenkins V. Donald L. Jenkins and Barbara Jenkins V.
1981
Kathryn H. Fortner v. Francis D. Fortner Kathryn H. Fortner v. Francis D. Fortner
1981