Barbeau v. Hoppenrath Barbeau v. Hoppenrath

Barbeau v. Hoppenrath

131 N.M. 124, 33 P.3D 675, 2001-NMCA-077, 2001.NM.0000094

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

1 Plaintiffs Ronald and Leora Barbeau (Barbeaus) originally filed their personal injury claim (first complaint) against Defendant Kim Hoppenrath (Hoppenrath) and Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (Oregon federal court) two days before the New Mexico statute of limitations on the claim expired. After the federal magistrate dismissed the suit and denied the motion to transfer venue to New Mexico, Barbeaus filed a second complaint in New Mexico district court attempting to avail themselves of the New Mexico Savings Statute, NMSA 1978, 37-1-14 (1880). The district court granted summary judgment to Hoppenrath and dismissed the case with prejudice. Barbeaus appeal. We affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2001
29 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
7
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
57.3
KB

Más libros de New Mexico Court of Appeals

Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz
1995
Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto
1995
Clayton v. Farmington City Council Clayton v. Farmington City Council
1995
In re Estate of Strozzi In re Estate of Strozzi
1995
State v. Curry State v. Curry
2002
State v. Fike State v. Fike
2002