D.A.S v. People

In this appeal, D.A.S. (the mother) contends that the court of appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the juvenile court which terminated her parental relationship with her children (O.J.S., A.S.S., and D.A.S., Jr. (Jr.)). The mother argues that reversal is necessary because the testimony of a psychologist and his report were admitted into evidence at the termination hearing in violation of the attorney-client privilege. We affirm.