Dale v. Hahn Dale v. Hahn

Dale v. Hahn

1971.C02.40521 440 F.2D 633

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

In 1951 plaintiff Rita Dale was involuntarily committed to Harlem Valley State Hospital in Wingdale, New York. She contends that she was committed as an alcoholic while the defendants contend that she was committed as a mental incompetent. In 1962, allegedly in order to facilitate payment to the New York Department of Mental Hygiene of amounts claimed to be due for services and treatment rendered to plaintiff, the hospital director, defendant Roberts, petitioned a state court for an order under § 1374 of New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (now § 102 of New Yorks Mental Hygiene Law) declaring plaintiff to be incompetent and appointing a committee to handle her affairs. Plaintiff alleges that she did not receive personal notice of that petition, and also that she was not given an opportunity to retain counsel, to appear and be heard in opposition to the petition, and to have a jury trial. Sections 1374 and 102 do not require any of the above procedures, which have been associated with due process, as a matter of right. The petition was granted without a hearing, and defendant Hahn was appointed as the committee. On April 10, 1967, defendant Pious was appointed as the successor committee. Again, plaintiff allegedly received no notice of the proceeding and was given no opportunity to be heard. On April 18, 1967 plaintiff was discharged. Thereafter she was declared competent, and is now gainfully employed.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1971
19 de febrero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
18
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
59.2
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Original Ballet Russe Ltd. V. Ballet Theatre Inc. Original Ballet Russe Ltd. V. Ballet Theatre Inc.
1943
Marinoff v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Marinoff v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
1996
In re Corporation In re Corporation
1939
Graham v. New York Graham v. New York
1988
American Construction Machinery & Equipment Corp. v. Mechanised Construction of Pakistan Ltd. American Construction Machinery & Equipment Corp. v. Mechanised Construction of Pakistan Ltd.
1987
Ginsberg v. Abrams Ginsberg v. Abrams
1983