![Dallas L. Wiethoff v. Keith A. Williams](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Dallas L. Wiethoff v. Keith A. Williams](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Dallas L. Wiethoff v. Keith A. Williams
1987.MN.1105, 413 N.W.2D 533
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
2. Lack of sufficient evidence to support damage award coupled with unduly harsh effect on appellant required that default judgment be vacated under Rule 60.02(6) to achieve a just result.