![Daly v. Chapman](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daly v. Chapman](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daly v. Chapman
1975.WA.40305 ; 539 P.2d 831; 85 Wash. 2d 780
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
The problem in this case can be stated briefly. A vacancy occurred in the office of the Secretary of State in early 1975. The Governor appointed the Honorable Bruce K. Chapman to fill the vacancy. A general election will be held in November 1975 and a primary election in September 1975. The question is: does the appointee serve the full unexpired term or is the office to be filled by election for the balance of the unexpired term in the 1975 elections?