![Daly v. Shrimplin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daly v. Shrimplin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daly v. Shrimplin
610 P.2D 397, 1980.WY.0000078
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
The appeals in the two cases here consolidated are from a single judgment which held in effect that appellant in Case No. 5192 did not have a valid security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code in an account receivable, and that appellant in Case No. 5193 did not have a right of setoff with reference to payment of an account receivable.