Dana Mc Candless v. Bobby Edgar Carpenter Dana Mc Candless v. Bobby Edgar Carpenter

Dana Mc Candless v. Bobby Edgar Carpenter

1993.ID.15045 ; 848 P.2D 444; 123 IDAHO 386

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

This case involves a dispute between two irrigation pipe repair business operators after one of them sold some used pipe repair equipment to the other. The seller brought this action to enforce noncompetition provisions of the sale contract between the two, requesting injunctive relief and liquidated damages. After trial, the district court ruled that the noncompete agreement lacked sufficient consideration to support specific performance of the agreement. The court also declined to enforce the liquidated damages provision based on the Conclusion that the noncompete clause was unenforceable. The seller has appealed, contending that the court erred in making these rulings. For reasons stated below, we affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1993
2 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
16
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
69.7
KB

Más libros de Court of Appeals of Idaho

State v. Downing State v. Downing
1996
State v. Pilik State v. Pilik
1996
J.P. Stravens v. City of Wallace J.P. Stravens v. City of Wallace
1996
State Idaho v. Steven Lee Hyde State Idaho v. Steven Lee Hyde
1995
State Idaho v. Dale H. Viehweg State Idaho v. Dale H. Viehweg
1995
John Doe I v. Fred Garcia and Christy John Doe I v. Fred Garcia and Christy
1995