![Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al.
1969.TX.41454; 449 S.W.2D 458, 13 TEX. SUP. J. 124
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the record shows as a matter of law that plaintiffs own the partnership interests in a limited partnership known as 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 21 TCS, Ltd. They claim to have acquired the same by assignment from Kirkeby-Natus Corporation, which held a lien thereon. They also claim, and the trial court held as a matter of law, that the principal defendant, Dr. Daniel Gevinson, had judicially admitted, and was estopped to deny, that Kirkeby-Natus had acquired title to the partnership interests by foreclosure of its lien prior to the assignment to plaintiffs.