Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al. Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al.

Daniel Gevinson Et Al. v. Manhattan Construction Company Oklahoma Et Al‪.‬

1969.TX.41454; 449 S.W.2D 458, 13 TEX. SUP. J. 124

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the record shows as a matter of law that plaintiffs own the partnership interests in a limited partnership known as 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 21 TCS, Ltd. They claim to have acquired the same by assignment from Kirkeby-Natus Corporation, which held a lien thereon. They also claim, and the trial court held as a matter of law, that the principal defendant, Dr. Daniel Gevinson, had judicially admitted, and was estopped to deny, that Kirkeby-Natus had acquired title to the partnership interests by foreclosure of its lien prior to the assignment to plaintiffs.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1969
31 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
23
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
83.4
KB

Más libros de Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Louis C. Leithold v. Thyra Nichols Plass and Gilbert Norman Plass Louis C. Leithold v. Thyra Nichols Plass and Gilbert Norman Plass
1967
Lawrence A. Sanders v. State Tennessee Lawrence A. Sanders v. State Tennessee
1989
Tiburcio Soto v. State Texas Tiburcio Soto v. State Texas
1984
Thomas J. Bain v. State Texas Thomas J. Bain v. State Texas
1984
Faelyn Ann Rogers v. State Texas Faelyn Ann Rogers v. State Texas
1985
Ex Parte Bernard Eugene Crisp Ex Parte Bernard Eugene Crisp
1983