![Daniel Kaye Ratliff v. State Idaho](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daniel Kaye Ratliff v. State Idaho](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daniel Kaye Ratliff v. State Idaho
1989.ID.15099 771 P.2D 61; 115 IDAHO 840
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
Douglas C. Etherington was convicted of misdemeanor driving while under the influence of alcohol. I.C. § 18-8004. He has appealed from the district courts decision upholding a magistrates order denying Etheringtons motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.