Danny Mcinturf v. State Texas

"In two grounds of error appellant complains of the failure of the trial court to charge the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence. Appellant contends there is no direct evidence identifying him as the perpetrator of his rape. The record reflects that a man entered prosecutrix trailer, exhibited a knife, made verbal threats, and committed acts of oral sodomy and intercourse. The prosecutrix identified appellant in court as the assailant based on a comparison of the sound, quality and tone of appellants voice. The voice identification was the only method by which the prosecutrix was able to identify the appellant.