Darious Golemon v. State

His principal contention now, as we see it, is that, since the original arrest of Golemon in Hempstead was without a warrant, the same constituted false imprisonment, as denounced by our Penal Code, and that, since the confession was secured while appellant was so falsely imprisoned, the same became inadmissible by virtue of Article 727a, C.C.P., which makes inadmissible evidence obtained by means of a violation of the Constitution or laws of Texas or the Constitution of the United States.