Darling v. Kansas Water Office Darling v. Kansas Water Office

Darling v. Kansas Water Office

245 Kan. 45, 774 P.2d 941, KS.0042104(1989)

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

The opinion of the court was delivered by Plaintiffs herein were classified employees of the Kansas Water
Office (KWO). In 1984, the Kansas Legislature enacted Senate Bill
No. 501 (L. 1984, ch. 285), which changed plaintiffs' jobs from
being in the classified service of the Kansas Civil Service Act,
K.S.A. 75-2925 et seq., to being unclassified and directed
their termination. Plaintiffs were terminated and appealed their
terminations to the Civil Service Board, which held it had no
jurisdiction as plaintiffs were no longer classified employees.
Plaintiffs appealed the Board's action to the district court
(Case No. 84-CV-876) and filed a separate action against
[245 Kan. 46]
Joseph F. Harkins, as Director of the Kansas Water Office, the
State of Kansas, and the Kansas Water Office (Case No.
84-CV-1212). The district court consolidated the two actions.
Summary judgment was granted in favor of plaintiffs with the
court holding the statutes involved were unconstitutional (K.S.A.
74-2614 and 74-2614a) and directing that plaintiffs be reinstated
with back pay. Defendants appeal from said determination and
plaintiffs cross-appeal from the district court's denial of their
request for attorney fees.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1989
26 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
16
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.8
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Kansas

Johnson v. Johnson Johnson v. Johnson
1976
Copeland v. Kansas State Bd. of Examiners in Optometry Copeland v. Kansas State Bd. of Examiners in Optometry
1974
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986
Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry
1975
State v. Williams & Reynolds State v. Williams & Reynolds
1975