Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal

Darwin E. Neibarger and Wife v. Universal

1992.MI.1211 , 486 N.W.2D 612, 439 MICH. 512

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

We granted leave to consider the applicability in these consolidated cases of the "economic loss doctrine," which bars tort recovery and limits remedies to those available under the Uniform Commercial Code where a claim for damages arises out of the commercial sale of goods and losses incurred are purely economic. If plaintiffs in these cases are limited by the doctrine to a warranty action governed by the UCC and its four-year statute of limitations, which recognizes no discovery rule, their claims are time-barred.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1992
20 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
44
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
85.7
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982