![Easton Darris Mullis v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Easton Darris Mullis v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Easton Darris Mullis v. State
1989.AL.135 , 545 SO. 2D 205
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
This is a medical malpractice case, brought pursuant to the third-party provisions of the Workmens Compensation Act (Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11). The plaintiff appeals from a holding that a general release executed by her and her husband upon the settlement of the now-deceased husbands workmens compensation claim against his employer discharged the unnamed third-party tort-feasor. We reverse.