Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality

Epistemology of Experimental Gravity: Scientific Rationality

Publisher Description

The evolution of gravitational tests from an epistemological perspective framed in the concept of rational reconstruction of Imre Lakatos, based on his methodology of research programmes. Unlike other works on the same subject, the evaluated period is very extensive, starting with Newton's natural philosophy and up to the quantum gravity theories of today. In order to explain in a more rational way the complex evolution of the gravity concept of the last century, I propose a natural extension of the methodology of the research programmes of Lakatos that I then use during the paper. I believe that this approach offers a new perspective on how evolved over time the concept of gravity and the methods of testing each theory of gravity, through observations and experiments. I argue, based on the methodology of the research programmes and the studies of scientists and philosophers, that the current theories of quantum gravity are degenerative, due to the lack of experimental evidence over a long period of time and of self-immunization against the possibility of falsification. Moreover, a methodological current is being developed that assigns a secondary, unimportant role to verification through observations and/or experiments. For this reason, it will not be possible to have a complete theory of quantum gravity in its current form, which to include to the limit the general relativity, since physical theories have always been adjusted, during their evolution, based on observational or experimental tests, and verified by the predictions made. Also, contrary to a widespread opinion and current active programs regarding the unification of all the fundamental forces of physics in a single final theory, based on string theory, I argue that this unification is generally unlikely, and it is not possible anyway for a unification to be developed based on current theories of quantum gravity, including string theory. In addition, I support the views of some scientists and philosophers that currently too much resources are being consumed on the idea of developing quantum gravity theories, and in particular string theory, to include general relativity and to unify gravity with other forces, as long as science does not impose such research programs.

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35350.70724

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2019
7 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
331
Pages
PUBLISHER
Nicolae Sfetcu
SELLER
Draft2Digital, LLC
SIZE
338.2
KB
Solaris, Directed By Andrei Tarkovsky - Psychological And Philosophical Aspects Solaris, Directed By Andrei Tarkovsky - Psychological And Philosophical Aspects
2019
The Distinction between Falsification and Refutation in the Demarcation Problem of Karl Popper The Distinction between Falsification and Refutation in the Demarcation Problem of Karl Popper
2019
Platon, Republica: Despre justiție – Dialectica și educația Platon, Republica: Despre justiție – Dialectica și educația
2022
Emotions and Emotional Intelligence in Organizations Emotions and Emotional Intelligence in Organizations
2020
Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the Law of Universal Gravitation Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the Law of Universal Gravitation
2019
Platon, La République: De la justice – Dialectique et éducation Platon, La République: De la justice – Dialectique et éducation
2022