Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati

Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati

30 Ohio St.3d 28, 505 N.E.2d 966, OH.40025(1987)

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

SWEENEY, J. Subsequent to the decision rendered by the court of appeals, it was adduced in oral argument that the theatre property which is the subject of this litigation was obtained by the city of Cincinnati and was then transferred to a non-profit organization which plans to operate the property as a theatre again. Therefore, FDI and Lipson waived oral argument before this court since the issues involved in this cause are moot with respect to their interests. Given this set of circumstances, our first inquiry is whether the instant cause should be dismissed on grounds of mootness.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1987
8 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
7
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
65.1
KB

Más libros de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli
1987
Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth. Pitts v. Cincinnati Met. Housing Auth.
1953
In re Pottery In re Pottery
1954
State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio State Ex Rel Sanor Sawmill, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
2004
State v. Doe State v. Doe
2004
State Ex Rel Cranford v. Cleveland State Ex Rel Cranford v. Cleveland
2004