G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson

G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson

C09.196 , 283 F.2d 86 (1960)

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

Before POPE, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: This appeal is taken from the Supreme Court of the Territory (now State) of Hawaii, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1293. It concerns the validity of the Hawaii Fair Trade Act (Â 205-21, 205-25, Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1955), which
legalizes contracts by which manufacturers of trademarked goods bind retailers, both contracting and non-contracting, to maintain
resale prices fixed by the manufacturer in the accepted contracts. Appellant contends, contrary to the judgment of the Hawaii
Supreme Court, that this Act is invalid under 3 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 3, and, in its application to non-contracting
retailers, that the Act violates the due process of law clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1960
12 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
6
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.6
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

In re Sugar Antitrust Litigation. American Crystal Sugar Co. In re Sugar Antitrust Litigation. American Crystal Sugar Co.
1977
Thomas Patrick Keating v. United States Thomas Patrick Keating v. United States
1969
M2 Software, Inc. v. Madacy Entertainment M2 Software, Inc. v. Madacy Entertainment
2005
Air-Sea Forwarders Inc. v. Air Asia Co. Air-Sea Forwarders Inc. v. Air Asia Co.
1989
Dollar Rent A Car Of Washington Inc. V. Travelers Indemnity Co. Dollar Rent A Car Of Washington Inc. V. Travelers Indemnity Co.
1985
Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004