![Gates v. Discovery Communications](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Gates v. Discovery Communications](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Gates v. Discovery Communications
101 P.3D 552, 34 CAL.4TH 679, 21 CAL.RPTR.3D 663, 2004 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 14,405, 33 MEDIA L. REP. 1173, 04 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 10,638, 4 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 10,638, 2004.CA.0010595
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
An employee of a city sued the city and two of its employees for defamation and wrongful termination, claiming she was fired and defamed for exposing corruption in the citys bidding for trash collection. The defamation cause of action was stricken under the statute prohibiting strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP) (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16), and the employee appeals. We reverse because the employee "has established that there is a probability that [she] will prevail on the claim." (Id., § 425.16, subd. (b)(1).) (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated.)