Gaynor v. Hird Gaynor v. Hird

Gaynor v. Hird

400 S.E.2d 788, 11 Va. App. 588, 1991.VA.40393

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

To the extent that [the courts order] purports to divide the jointly owned residence, it is in error. Although a trial court may appropriately consider a partys contribution to the acquisition of marital property, see § 20-107.3(E)(2), it has no authority to divide marital property. McGinnis v. McGinnis, 1 Va. App. 272, 276, 338 S.E.2d 159, 161 (1985). It only has authority to partition jointly owned property, and this may be done only in a manner that will insure that each owner receives the amount of money or property to which his interest in the property entitles him. Morris v. Morris, 3 Va. App. 303, 310, 349 S.E.2d 661, 665 (1986).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1991
29 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
7
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
51.5
KB

Más libros de Virginia Court of Appeals

Taitano v. Commonwealth Taitano v. Commonwealth
1987
Zigta v. Commonwealth Zigta v. Commonwealth
2002
Bruhn v. Commonwealth Bruhn v. Commonwealth
2001
Karim v. Commonwealth Karim v. Commonwealth
1996
Berner v. Mills Berner v. Mills
2002
Crisp v. Browns Tysons Corner Dodge Inc. Crisp v. Browns Tysons Corner Dodge Inc.
1986