Descripción de editorial
Jose Irineo Gonzalez-Ororpeza ("Mr. Gonzalez"), his wife Guadalupe Garcia-Pineda ("Mrs. Gonzalez"), and their son Jose Gonzalez-Garcia ("Jose, Jr.") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Petitioners"), through counsel, appeal from the Board of Immigration Appealss ("BIAs") affirmance without opinion of the Immigration Judges ("IJs") denial of their applications for cancellation of removal pursuant to Â§ 240A(b) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Â§ 1229b(b). On appeal, Petitioners argue that the BIA violated their due process rights by issuing an affirmance without opinion ("AWO") pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Â§ 3.1(a)(7), because their appeal was not appropriate for an AWO. They claim that the IJ failed to properly consider the facts and equities presented. Further, they allege that on appeal the BIA failed to perform an individualized analysis of the facts of the case and that the BIAs holding was "so fundamentally deficient that it constitutes a denial of due process."