Leisy v. Hardin. Leisy v. Hardin.

Leisy v. Hardin‪.‬

10 S. CT. 681, 135 U.S. 100, 34 L. ED. 128, 1890.SCT.40213

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

The power vested in Congress "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes," is the power to prescribe the rule by which that commerce is to be governed, and is a power complete in itself, acknowledging no limitations other than those prescribed in the Constitution. It is co-extensive with the subject on which it acts and cannot be stopped at the external boundary of a State, but must enter its interior and must be capable of authorizing the disposition of those articles which it introduces, so that they may become mingled with the common mass of property within the territory entered. Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1890
28 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
82
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
90.8
KB
Gregory v. Helvering Gregory v. Helvering
1935
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2022 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2022
2022
Spinelli v. United States Spinelli v. United States
1969
Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Company Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Company
1904
United States v. Dunn United States v. Dunn
1987
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024