Maintenance Management Inc. v. Tinkle Maintenance Management Inc. v. Tinkle

Maintenance Management Inc. v. Tinkle

570 P.2D 840, 40 COLO. APP. 80, 1977.CO.40147

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

This is an original proceeding which is buttressed by only a skeleton record. The petitioner, Arthur Jerome Watson, seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent district court from forcing him to go to trial immediately after a scheduled hearing on his counsels motion to withdraw. Petitioner also seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to allow his counsel to withdraw because of a conflict of interest. As a result of our rule to show cause, the continuance sought by petitioner has in effect been granted. We now discharge the rule.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1977
15 de septiembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
4
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
60.5
KB
Quintana v. City of Westminster Quintana v. City of Westminster
2002
People v. Rivers People v. Rivers
2002
Serna v. Kingston Enterprises Serna v. Kingston Enterprises
2002
People v. Rogers People v. Rogers
2002
People v. Valdez People v. Valdez
2002
Colorado Springs Disposal v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office Colorado Springs Disposal v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
2002