Steenburg v. Harry Braunstein Steenburg v. Harry Braunstein

Steenburg v. Harry Braunstein

DE.87, 77 A.2d 206, 588 (1950)(45 Del)

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

LAYTON, Judge. Defendant has moved first to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that Plaintiff is not the real party in interest within the meaning of Rule 17(a) of the Rules of the Superior Court which is identical with Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 17(a), 28 U.S.C.A. The Rule reads 'Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest * * *.' Defendant contends that this motion presents squarely the question whether an Insured is entitled to maintain an action in his own name against a third party for damages despite the fact that he has been fully paid for his loss by an insurance carrier under a so-called loan agreement.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1950
22 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
4
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
56.8
KB

Más libros de New Castle Superior Court of Delaware

Mayor and Council Wilmington v. Cathedral Mayor and Council Wilmington v. Cathedral
1954
State Delaware v. Antonio Rivera and Angel State Delaware v. Antonio Rivera and Angel
1986
Charles Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. Charles Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp.
1987
Silverside Home Mart v. H. Earl Hall Et Silverside Home Mart v. H. Earl Hall Et
1975
Charles F. Boughton v. Division Charles F. Boughton v. Division
1972
Bradford v. Travelers Indemnity Company Bradford v. Travelers Indemnity Company
1972