![T. C. B. v. H. A. B.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![T. C. B. v. H. A. B.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
T. C. B. v. H. A. B.
1984.WV.108 , 317 S.E.2D 174, 173 W.VA. 410
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
1. "If the trial court is unable to establish that one parent has clearly taken primary responsibility for the caring and nurturing duties of a child neither party shall have the benefit of the primary caretaker presumption." Syl. pt. 5, Garska v. McCoy, 167 W.Va. 59, 278 S.E.2d 357 (1981).