Tackett V. City Of Huntington Beach Tackett V. City Of Huntington Beach
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

Do the recent amendments to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, requiring a trial court to vacate a default, default judgment, or dismissal if the aggrieved party's attorney submits a timely application for relief "in proper form, . . . accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect," apply to a motion under Government Code section 946.6 for relief from the claim-filing requirement under the Government Tort Claims Act? No. Alternatively, did the superior court abuse its discretion in concluding the petitioning party failed to show excusable neglect that would warrant relief from the Government Code's tort claims filing requirement? Again, the answer is no.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1994
28 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
9
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66.4
KB

Más libros de Fourth Appellate District, Division Three Court of Appeal of California

Zambrano v. Dorough Zambrano v. Dorough
1986
Haight v. Handweiler Haight v. Handweiler
1988
Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B
1985
Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek
1987