Teitelman v. Bloomstein Teitelman v. Bloomstein

Teitelman v. Bloomstein

155 Conn. 653, 236 A.2d 900, CT.0042253(1967)

    • $9.00
    • $9.00

Descripción editorial

The plaintiff has appealed from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to set aside a directed verdict for the defendant. The appeal is defective in form because it is taken from the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict rather than from the final judgment. General Statutes 52-263; Practice Book 600; Palega v. Bulgajewski, 150 Conn. 695, 186 A.2d 801; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. 183. The defendant, however, by failing to move to dismiss the appeal, has waived the defect. Desmarais v. Pinto, 147 Conn. 109, 110, 157 A.2d 596; Van Detti v. Parsons Bros., Inc., 146 Conn. 282, 283, 150 A.2d 200.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1967
19 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
11
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
60.4
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Connecticut

Community Credit Union, Inc. v. Connors Community Credit Union, Inc. v. Connors
1954
Sullivan v. Sullivan Sullivan v. Sullivan
1954
Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations
1986
Stratford v. Local 134 Ifpte Stratford v. Local 134 Ifpte
1986
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ferrante Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ferrante
1986
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Powers General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Powers
1950