'Timely, impassioned and brilliantly argued' Rod Liddle, Sunday Times
'A spirited and exhilarating read' Joan Bakewell, Guardian
Dawkins attacks God in all his forms.
He eviscerates the major arguments for religion and demonstrates the supreme improbability of a supreme being. He shows how religion fuels war, foments bigotry and abuses children.
The God Delusion is a brilliantly argued, fascinating polemic that will be required reading for anyone interested in this most emotional and important subject.
The antireligion wars started by Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris will heat up even more with this salvo from celebrated Oxford biologist Dawkins. For a scientist who criticizes religion for its intolerance, Dawkins has written a surprisingly intolerant book, full of scorn for religion and those who believe. But Dawkins, who gave us the selfish gene, anticipates this criticism. He says it's the scientist and humanist in him that makes him hostile to religions fundamentalist Christianity and Islam come in for the most opprobrium that close people's minds to scientific truth, oppress women and abuse children psychologically with the notion of eternal damnation. While Dawkins can be witty, even confirmed atheists who agree with his advocacy of science and vigorous rationalism may have trouble stomaching some of the rhetoric: the biblical Yahweh is "psychotic," Aquinas's proofs of God's existence are "fatuous" and religion generally is "nonsense." The most effective chapters are those in which Dawkins calms down, for instance, drawing on evolution to disprove the ideas behind intelligent design. In other chapters, he attempts to construct a scientific scaffolding for atheism, such as using evolution again to rebut the notion that without God there can be no morality. He insists that religion is a divisive and oppressive force, but he is less convincing in arguing that the world would be better and more peaceful without it.
Reseñas de clientes
Filled with great arguments about why there is certainly no god, and wide scientific research to sustain it. This work is a great book for understanding religion, why does it exists, why culturally has been successful,and how it is slowly beginning to fade.
Science is each day gaining more and more adepts while religion does otherwise.
Why 4 and not 5? I just didn’t like the tone it is written. Sometimes I felt the author was mocking and laughing at religious people and it made me feel a bit uncomfortable. (But probably it was just me so… nvm)