![United States v. Wolfe](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States v. Wolfe](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States v. Wolfe
309 F.3d 932, 2002.C06.0000389
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2002 FED App. 0387P (6th Cir.) Argued: September 12, 2002 OPINION Defendant Donald Wolfe pleaded guilty to a series of Ohio bank robberies. On appeal, counsel raises the following issue related to the federal Sentencing Guidelines: Did the district court abuse its discretion when it departed upward by two levels because the multiple count adjustment, U.S.S.G. § 3D1.4, inadequately reflected the number of robberies committed by defendant? We conclude that it did not and therefore affirm the judgment. I.