F. B. v. State Florida

Per Curiam. On the basis of evidence which showed only that F. B. was present at the scene of an automobile theft, and that he fled when
approached by the police, the trial court found F. B. guilty of car theft, burglary of a conveyance, criminal mischief and
resisting arrest without violence. We have previously held that a suspect's mere presence at the scene of a crime and flight
therefrom is insufficient evidence to support an adjudication of delinquency. M.F. v. State, 549 So.2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989);
J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, the trial court's finding of guilt as to auto theft, burglary
of a conveyance, and criminal mischief is reversed.