![Faith W. Cook v. Hecks Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Faith W. Cook v. Hecks Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Faith W. Cook v. Hecks Inc.
1986.WV.133, 342 S.E.2D 453, 176 W.VA. 368
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
1. "Upon a motion to direct a verdict for the defendant, every reasonable and legitimate inference fairly arising from the testimony, when considered in its entirety, must be indulged in favorably to plaintiff; and the court must assume as true those facts which the jury may properly find under the evidence. Syl., Nichols v. Raleigh-Wyoming Coal Co., 112 W.Va. 85, 163 S.E. 767 (1932)." Syl. pt. 1, Totten v. Adongay, 175 W.Va. 634, 337 S.E.2d 2 (1985).