Faxon Hills Constr. Co. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

Despite the temptation to do so, it is not necessary to discuss several questions incidentally presented by this record, such as whether under the constitutions of the defendant unions (exhibits 1 and 2) the purpose of the picketing was to get a closed shop, and whether the so-called "no-mans land" recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U. S., 1, 1 L. Ed. (2d), 601, 77 S. Ct., 598; Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen of North America, Local No. 427, v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc., 353 U. S., 20, 1 L. Ed. (2d), 613, 77 S. Ct., 604; San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 353 U. S., 26, 1 L. Ed. (2d), 618, 77 S. Ct., 607, requires the judiciary of Ohio to abdicate its responsibility to secure to each citizen the constitutionally guaranteed right to a "remedy by due course of law" for injury done him.