Federal Trade Commission v. Tashman Federal Trade Commission v. Tashman

Federal Trade Commission v. Tashman

318 F.3d 1273, 2003.C11.0000027

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

[PUBLISH] The investing public is concerned with two factors when confronted with a business opportunity: risk and reward. This point was underscored in a recent case in this Court. See Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. R.J. Fitzgerald & Co., 310 F.3d 1321(11th Cir. 2002). There, we held that the defendant made misleading statements when it spoke of ""unlimited profit potential"" and ways to ""limit risk"" while, in fact, 95% of the firm's customers lost money on its proposed investments. The representations created a picture of the risk-to-reward ratio that, when compared to reality, was heavily distorted.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
24 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
24
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
70.1
KB

Más libros de Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Davis v. Great Western Bank Davis v. Great Western Bank
1993
Wiley v. Thomas Wiley v. Thomas
1993
Arlook v. Lichtenberg Arlook v. Lichtenberg
1992
Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts
1992
In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.
1989
Hutcherson v. Progressive Corporation Hutcherson v. Progressive Corporation
1993