![Feller Et Al. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Feller Et Al. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Feller Et Al. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
1950.PA.40023; 70 A.2D 299, 363 PA. 483
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
The question is whether a certain purchasing agent was an employee of plaintiffs within the meaning of a "blanket position bond" which defendant had issued to them. The bond agreed to indemnify them against any loss of money or other property through theft or embezzlement committed by any of their employees.