Finch V. Southside Lincoln-Mercury Finch V. Southside Lincoln-Mercury

Finch V. Southside Lincoln-Mercury

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

¶1. James and Tricia Finch appeal the dismissal of their claims against Ford Motor Company and three of its employees who served as directors of Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. The trial court concluded that certain language in the lease between the Finches and Southside absolved Ford, who was Southside's controlling shareholder, and the three directors from any liability for the Finches' claims against them. The Finches contend that the court erred in dismissing their claims because the clause at issue did not bar their claims for breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with a contract and violation of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), and that each of these claims was well pled in their amended complaint. We agree that the last two claims should not have been dismissed. Accordingly, we reverse the appealed order in part and remand for further proceedings on the tortious interference and UFTA claims.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2004
20 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
34
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
79.7
KB

Más libros de State of Wisconsin in Court of Appeals District IV

Madcap I, Llc v. Mcnamee Madcap I, Llc v. Mcnamee
2005
Preston v. Meriter Hospital Preston v. Meriter Hospital
2004
Mrozek v. Intra Financial Corporation Mrozek v. Intra Financial Corporation
2004
Brinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Brinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
2004
Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance v. Fiber Recovery Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance v. Fiber Recovery
2004
Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
2003