Fine V. Checcio Fine V. Checcio

Fine V. Checcio

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

These are consolidated appeals, in which Appellant Eric Fine ("Fine") sued Appellee Mary Anne Checcio, D.D.S. ("Dr. Checcio"), and Appellee Rosezetta Marie Ward ("Ward") sued Appellants Jeffrey W. Rice, D.M.D. and Jeffrey W. Rice, D.M.D., P.C. (collectively, "Dr. Rice"), for dental malpractice. Dr. Checcio and Dr. Rice each filed a motion for summary judgment based on the two year statute of limitations in 42 Pa.C.S. §5524(2).*fn1 In their respective responses, Fine and Ward raised the discovery rule and the doctrine of fraudulent concealment. At the trial court level, Dr. Checcio's motion for summary judgment was denied, but Dr. Rice's motion for summary judgment was granted. The Superior Court reversed the trial court in both cases. We conclude that neither Dr. Checcio nor Dr. Rice was entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow, we reverse the Superior Court's order in the appeal brought by Fine and affirm the Superior Court's order in the appeal brought by Dr. Rice.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2005
30 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
25
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.9
KB

Más libros de In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Wimbush Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Wimbush
2000
Office Of Disciplinary Counsel V. Marcone Office Of Disciplinary Counsel V. Marcone
2004