Finn V. Searle Finn V. Searle

Finn V. Searle

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Plaintiff Michael Finn, a minor, appeals from a judgment for defendants in a civil action for personal injury. The claimed prejudicial error arises from the trial court's modification of certain jury instructions offered by plaintiff. Although we granted hearing in this case to consider the application of strict liability principles to injurious side effects allegedly produced by prescription drugs, our review of the record has convinced us that in light of the basis upon which plaintiff tried his case, this broader issue is not properly before us. Rather, we shall conclude that plaintiff has not demonstrated that it is reasonably probable that the trial court's modifications of his proposed instructions affected the judgment. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1984
29 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
62
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
84.4
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court Of California

Kipp v. Kipp Kipp v. Kipp
1954
Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1952
Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles
1953
Schlothan v. Rusalem Schlothan v. Rusalem
1953
People v. Bechtel People v. Bechtel
1953
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident Commission Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident Commission
1951