![First National Bank Bryan v. Frederick E. Peterson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![First National Bank Bryan v. Frederick E. Peterson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
First National Bank Bryan v. Frederick E. Peterson
1986.TX.40505; 709 S.W.2D 276
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
This is an appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of appellee, Frederick E. Peterson. In three points of error appellant complains that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant its motion for new trial; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in failing to consider equitable principles in denying its motion for new trial; and (3) the return of service on the Writ of Garnishment was defective and will not support a default judgment. We affirm.