Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products

Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products

233 Kan. 339, 662 P.2d 1254, KS.0042144(1983)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The opinion of the court was delivered by This is a dispute between plaintiff subcontractor, Foley Company, and defendant general contractor, Niro Atomizer, Inc., concerning the confirmation of an arbitration award by the district court. Defendant Niro appeals from the judgment of the district court confirming and refusing to vacate the arbitration award entered in favor of plaintiff Foley. Niro entered into a general construction contract with defendant Grindsted Products, Inc. (which is not a party to this appeal), whereby Niro was to construct a chemical processing facility on premises located in Olathe, Johnson County, Kansas, and leased to Grindsted by defendant Johnson County Airport Commission (also not a party to this appeal). Subsequently on July 5, 1979, Niro entered into a subcontract with Foley whereby Foley was to perform various piping and pipeline portions of the general [233 Kan. 340]

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1983
29 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
21
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
65.9
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Kansas

Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986
Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry
1975
State v. Williams & Reynolds State v. Williams & Reynolds
1975
State v. Cameron & Bentley State v. Cameron & Bentley
1975
Querry v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Querry v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
1975