S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp. S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.

S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp‪.‬

NY.45453; 508 N.E.2d 647; 69 N.Y.2d 437 (1987)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

[69 N.Y.2d 437 Page 440] Opinion OF THE COURT The advocate-witness disqualification rules contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility provide guidance, not binding authority, for courts in determining whether a party's law firm, at its adversary's instance, should be disqualified during litigation. Courts must, in addition, consider such factors as the party's valued right to choose its own counsel, and the fairness and effect in the particular factual setting of granting disqualification or continuing representation. Concluding that the court below failed to exercise any discretion, and that disqualification was not required by the circumstances presented, we reverse the Appellate Division order and deny defendant's motion.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1987
30 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
12
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
71.5
KB

Más libros de Court of Appeals of New York

Cantalino v. Danner Cantalino v. Danner
2001
People State New York v. William R. Miller People State New York v. William R. Miller
1987
People State New York v. Larry Burton Bennett People State New York v. Larry Burton Bennett
1987
Guardian Life Insurance Company America v. Merlin C. Schaefer Guardian Life Insurance Company America v. Merlin C. Schaefer
1987
People State New York v. Kevin Paulin People State New York v. Kevin Paulin
1987
People State New York v. Kenneth A. Kozlowski People State New York v. Kenneth A. Kozlowski
1987