![Abelsen v. Abelsen](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Abelsen v. Abelsen](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Abelsen v. Abelsen
1950.OR.40003 225 P.2D 768; 190 OR. 319
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
and urge that the court, in its opinion, erred in holding that: The court necessarily acquires jurisdiction through the allegations of the petition. It is argued that: There is a presumption of jurisdiction which attaches to courts of general jurisdiction. Counsel cites 1 Am.Jur. § 33, 636, and 1 Am.Jur. § 34, 637, and In re Grazzinis Estate, 31 Cal.App.2d 168, 87 P.2d 713.