![Acculog v. Keith Peterson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Acculog v. Keith Peterson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Acculog v. Keith Peterson
1984.UT.112, 692 P.2D 728
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
HOWE, Justice: Plaintiffs Acculog appeal from a judgment of "no cause of action" which was entered after a jury returned a special verdict. Acculogs 1977 four-wheel-drive Ford E250 Quadravan, estimated at a value of $7,000, caught fire and was destroyed later in the same day that defendant Peterson Ford had installed a new fuel filter to correct overheating in the engine. Also destroyed in the fire was Acculogs geological equipment consisting of a Mount Sopris bore-hole logging unit mounted on the vehicle and stipulated to have a value of $41,687.95. Acculog claimed that the destruction of the van and equipment resulted in a loss of profits estimated by it at over $33,000. On the day of the fire Acculog did not carry a fire extinguisher in its van.