C. C. Rowlett v. State

1. That the date in the information on which the antecedent prohibition election was alleged to have been held was a matter
of form only and could be amended after announcement by virtue of our holdings in Young v. State, 55 Tex. Crim. 383, 116 S.W. 1158, and Murphy v. State, 36 Tex. Crim. 24, 35 S.W. 174.