City Austin Et Al. v. Schmedes Et Al.
1954.TX.40946 270 S.W.2D 442
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Beschrijving uitgever
All appellants have filed motions for rehearing but only Dean Skinners motion requires further attention. He states that in holding that appellees have a cause of action against him under his contract with the State we are in conflict with Taylor v. Dunn, 80 Tex. 652, 16 S.W. 732, Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines, 125 Tex. 154, 81 S.W.2d 482 and Buckner v. Colwell, Tex.Civ.App., Beaumont, 131 S.W.2d 675.