Comments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Comments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam"
Intimations of Political Philosophy

Comments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam‪"‬

    • € 1,99
    • € 1,99

Beschrijving uitgever

Mansoureh Tajik is a Shi'a Muslim Twelve-Imami and a believer in Iran's current system of governance. In October 2020, the Saker website courageously posts his articles. In doing so, the Saker serves as a witness.
These comments consider only the first three articles. The first article is titled, "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam: Iranian Revolution and Constitution, Part 1". The second article and third articles are "A Delegated System of Governance: Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam, Part 2 and Part 3". The third article finishes with a promise of more to come.
Despite this promise, these articles compose a cohesive critique, told through intertwining narratives.
Tajik describes the conditions which give rise to the Iranian revolt in 1979. In America, these same conditions ripen into Big Government (il)Liberalism and trigger the unanticipated election of a politically incorrect candidate, in 2016.
Persia turns away from her destiny as a satellite of the American Empire and sets upon a path to a form of governance that expresses the same relational structure as BG(il)L, but fills that relational structure with vastly different elements.
Is that surprising?
This same relational structure may be involved in a far deeper turning away, taking place over a thousand years ago. It is hard to say, but the suggestion cannot be denied. A foundational split occurs upon the death of Mohammed and its trace is found in the content-level normal context and potential in the interscope for the Iranian Republic. The content-level normal context and potential for American Big Government (il)Liberalism suggests how this historic trace may have come to be. A comparison of the two interscopes is instructive.
The associations in this commentary allows the reader to imagine a mystery, intrinsic to Mansoureh Tajik's discussion, yet invisible without the category-based nested form.

GENRE
Non-fictie
UITGEGEVEN
2020
22 november
TAAL
EN
Engels
LENGTE
26
Pagina's
UITGEVER
Razie Mah
GROOTTE
487,4
kB

Meer boeken van Razie Mah

Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory
2015
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2
2024
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2
2024
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything"
2023

Andere boeken in deze serie

Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory
2015
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything"
2023
Comments on Daniel Estulin's Book (2021) "2045 Global Projects at War" Comments on Daniel Estulin's Book (2021) "2045 Global Projects at War"
2022
Comments on Ahmed Badawi’s Essay (2018) "Conflicted Rules Theory" Comments on Ahmed Badawi’s Essay (2018) "Conflicted Rules Theory"
2020
Comments on Tyler Paytas' Essay (2019) "Divine Hiddenness as Kantian Theodicy" Comments on Tyler Paytas' Essay (2019) "Divine Hiddenness as Kantian Theodicy"
2019
Comments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism Comments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism
2017