E. Edelman & Company v. Queen Stove Works E. Edelman & Company v. Queen Stove Works

E. Edelman & Company v. Queen Stove Works

1939.MN.68, 284 N.W. 838, 205 MINN. 7

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

1. Where a buyer, ignorant of his own needs, fully informs the seller of the purpose for which an article is to be used, and, after so doing, adopts a description supplied by the seller, a warranty of fitness for the purpose can be implied.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1939
24 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
19
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
72
KB

More Books by En Banc Supreme Court of Minnesota

James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation
1988
State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board
1985
Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault
1985
Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company
1985
Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul
1978
State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch
1989