![Edmund J. Matras v. Amoco Oil Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Edmund J. Matras v. Amoco Oil Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Edmund J. Matras v. Amoco Oil Company
1986.MI.299, 385 N.W.2D 586, 424 MICH. 675
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The issue presented is whether the Court of Appeals erred in setting aside a jury verdict on the ground that there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable person to find that age discrimination was a determining factor in the discharge of Edmund Matras. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable person to find that age discrimination was a determining factor, and that the Court of Appeals did err.