![Escobedo v. Illinois](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Escobedo v. Illinois](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Escobedo v. Illinois
84 S. CT. 1758, 378 U.S. 478, 12 L. ED. 2D 977, 1964.SCT.40485
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The critical question in this case is whether, under the circumstances, the refusal by the police to honor petitioners request to consult with his lawyer during the course of an interrogation constitutes a denial of "the Assistance of Counsel" in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution as "made obligatory upon the States by the Fourteenth Amendment," Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 342, and thereby renders inadmissible in a state criminal trial any incriminating statement elicited by the police during the interrogation.
More Books by Supreme Court of the United States
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 1/2
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 15 Commerce and Trade
2024