Gaetana Mazzola v. Mary Mazzola Gaetana Mazzola v. Mary Mazzola

Gaetana Mazzola v. Mary Mazzola

NY.44543; 338 N.Y.S.2d 911; 40 A.D.2d 1017 (1972)

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

In our opinion, it was incumbent upon defendant to come forward with matter of an evidentiary nature to demonstrate the presence of triable issues. This the defendant failed to do. She failed to support by the requisite evidentiary demonstration her contention that a triable issue of fact exists, thereby precluding summary judgment relief. The motion should have been granted (Steingart Assoc. v. Sandler, 28 A.D.2d 801; Holdridge v. Town of Burlington, 32 A.D.2d 581). Disposition Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1972
26 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
66.5
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of New York

Philipp Brothers Export Corporation Philipp Brothers Export Corporation
1982
Matter Lora Thaler v. Richard M. Thaler Matter Lora Thaler v. Richard M. Thaler
1968
Matter Frank Dinino v. Dana Deima Matter Frank Dinino v. Dana Deima
1991
Tom and Jerry v. Nebraska Liquor Control Tom and Jerry v. Nebraska Liquor Control
1968
Hwesu S. Murray Hwesu S. Murray
1991
Bsl Development Corp. Bsl Development Corp.
1991